12% Initiative: Stop brandishing fear
Translated from French and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- An opinion piece argues that opponents of Vaud’s proposed 12% cut in income and wealth taxes are using exaggerated warnings about schools, hospitals and Château de Chillon.
- Florence Bettschart-Narbel says the canton, whose revenues exceed 12 billion Swiss francs, can absorb the reduction while protecting essential services.
- She argues that the initiative would require spending priorities and improve the canton’s tax appeal.
Opponents of Vaud’s initiative to cut cantonal income and wealth taxes by 12% warn that schools could close, hospitals could reduce services and even Château de Chillon could be threatened. Florence Bettschart-Narbel, president of the Vaud Liberal-Radical Party and a member of the cantonal parliament, calls those warnings a campaign built on fear.
In her view, the initiative would not condemn public services or subsidized institutions. Instead, a tax reduction would force the state to decide which spending deserves priority.
Bettschart-Narbel argues that claims about unavoidable damage to essential services do not amount to a serious discussion of public finances. Vaud’s revenues exceed 12 billion Swiss francs, she notes, and she rejects the idea that the canton could not absorb a 12% reduction without attacking core services.
She presents the proposal as a way to restore the canton’s fiscal attractiveness while requiring better control over spending. The debate, she argues, should focus on financial priorities rather than apocalyptic predictions.
Originally published by Le Temps in French. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.