DistantNews
Support us
25 states sue Trump administration over new tariffs, citing Supreme Court ruling
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States /Crime & Justice

25 states sue Trump administration over new tariffs, citing Supreme Court ruling

From PBS NewsHour · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources New plan
  • Twenty-five states are suing the Trump administration over new tariffs, arguing they are an illegal attempt to replace import taxes struck down by the Supreme Court.
  • The administration claims the new tariffs, imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, are a legally durable tool to address unfair trade practices, specifically forced labor.
  • The lawsuit highlights a conflict between states challenging federal tariff policy and the administration's efforts to revive domestic manufacturing through trade measures.

Twenty-five states have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging the legality of its latest tariffs. The states contend these tariffs are a pretext to replace import taxes previously invalidated by the Supreme Court. The administration had imposed double-digit tariffs on 59 countries and the European Union, citing their failure to curb imports produced by forced labor.

After losing at the Supreme Court, the administration is once again trying to illegally raise taxes on families and businesses with a new round of tariffs.

โ€” Letitia JamesNew York Attorney General Letitia James explains the states' reasoning for suing the Trump administration.

New York Attorney General Letitia James stated, "After losing at the Supreme Court, the administration is once again trying to illegally raise taxes on families and businesses with a new round of tariffs." This move comes as President Trump seeks to revive American manufacturing, overturning decades of U.S. policy favoring lower tariffs and freer trade.

The United States is using its lawful authority to obtain the elimination of unreasonable acts, policies, and practices that burden U.S. commerce.

โ€” Kush DesaiWhite House spokesman Kush Desai defends the administration's use of tariffs.

The administration invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for the initial tariffs, but the Supreme Court ruled it did not authorize such measures, leading to refunds for importers. To compensate for lost revenue, Trump then turned to temporary 10% worldwide tariffs, which expired July 24. The current tariffs are being imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, a provision previously used successfully against China, which allows the president to impose import taxes and sanctions against countries engaging in unfair trade practices.

A foreign country's failure to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is unreasonable and burdens U.S. commerce, including American workers, and must be addressed.

โ€” Kush DesaiWhite House spokesman Kush Desai explains the rationale behind the forced-labor tariffs.

White House spokesman Kush Desai defended the tariffs, asserting, "The United States is using its lawful authority to obtain the elimination of unreasonable acts, policies, and practices that burden U.S. commerce." He added that Section 301 tariffs have proven to be a legally durable tool. The new tariffs, ranging from 10% to 12.5%, target countries responsible for 99% of American imports.

Section 301 tariffs have proven to be a legally durable tool since the President's first term, and they remain so now.

โ€” Kush DesaiWhite House spokesman Kush Desai asserts the legal standing of the Section 301 tariffs.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by PBS NewsHour in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.