78 Turkish Bar Associations Unite: 'Right to Defense Cannot Be Delegated to AI'
Translated from Turkish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- 78 bar associations in Turkey have issued a joint statement opposing the use of artificial intelligence in the judiciary.
- They argue that AI should not undermine the right to defense and that legal processes relying on technology must not weaken fundamental legal safeguards.
- The statement emphasizes that justice requires human judgment and ethical consideration, not just data processing, and warns against replacing lawyers with AI.
A significant coalition of 78 bar associations across Turkey has voiced strong opposition to the integration of artificial intelligence into the judicial system, directly responding to recent remarks by Justice Minister Akฤฑn Gรผrlek. Their joint declaration, titled 'The Right to Defense Cannot Be Delegated to Artificial Intelligence,' underscores a deep-seated concern that technological advancements, if implemented without caution, could erode fundamental legal rights and principles.
The struggle against the weakening of the defense authority by citing technological tools will continue.
The bar associations argue that while AI can serve as a tool, it must not supplant the essential human element in legal proceedings. They emphasize that the right to a fair trial, a cornerstone of justice, relies on independent and impartial judgment, coupled with the effective exercise of the right to defense. Weakening these safeguards, they contend, directly undermines legal security and public trust in the judiciary. The statement meticulously references the Turkish Attorneyship Law, asserting that legal counsel and the defense of rights are exclusive domains of licensed lawyers, grounded in ethical principles and conscientious judgment.
The right to defense cannot be delegated to artificial intelligence.
This collective stance highlights a critical debate unfolding globally: how to balance technological innovation with the preservation of human rights and ethical standards in the legal field. The Turkish bar associations are particularly wary of applications that might allow citizens to seek legal support through AI without direct lawyer assistance, viewing this as a direct infringement on the essence of the right to defense. They draw a parallel between the absurdity of demanding an 'AI judge' and the equal peril of an 'AI lawyer,' asserting that justice is not merely a computational outcome but a product of human conscience and reasoned deliberation. The message is clear: digitalization should support, not replace, the human-centric nature of the justice system.
The approach of the administration towards 'AI lawyer' is equally problematic as the demand for 'AI judge' is contrary to legal logic.
Originally published by Cumhuriyet in Turkish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.