A 10-acre site in Dublin 6 exposes the depth of Ireland’s planning paralysis
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A 10-acre site in Dublin 6, purchased by Ardstone for €69 million, exemplifies Ireland's planning paralysis.
- Initial plans for 667 build-to-rent apartments were approved but faced judicial review due to scale, traffic, and tree removal concerns.
- Subsequent modified plans for 636 homes also encountered legal challenges, highlighting ongoing issues with density and green infrastructure in Dublin's development.
The saga of the 10-acre site at Sandford Road and Milltown Road in Dublin 6, as detailed by the Irish Times, serves as a stark illustration of Ireland's deeply entrenched planning paralysis. This prime piece of real estate, acquired by Ardstone for a substantial €69 million in 2019, has become a battleground, showcasing the complex web of resident concerns, developer ambitions, and regulatory hurdles that plague development in the capital.
Ardstone's initial ambition, through its subsidiary Sandford Living Ltd, was to construct 667 primarily build-to-rent apartments. While An Bord Pleanála granted permission in 2021 under the former Strategic Housing Development (SHD) system, the project immediately drew the ire of local residents' groups. Their objections centered on the sheer scale of the development, potential traffic chaos, and the proposed felling of trees, issues that ultimately led to a High Court judicial review.
The situation grew even more convoluted when, in May 2024, An Bord Pleanála conceded to issues raised in the review. A particularly sensitive point involved Stefan Hyde, brother of a former deputy chairman of An Bord Pleanála who had resigned over conflicts of interest, being a director of a company that produced a disability access report for the developer. This revelation cast a shadow over the integrity of the planning process.
Even a modified plan in 2023, reducing the number of homes to 636, failed to appease objectors. This revised proposal, submitted under the new Large-scale Residential Development system, was granted permission by Dublin City Council but was again met with judicial review proceedings. Appellants argued that the density contravened city development plan guidelines and that the developer's claims about public transport capacity were merely theoretical. The Irish Times' reporting underscores how such protracted disputes, often fueled by legitimate local concerns but amplified by complex legal avenues, contribute to a significant housing shortage and a sense of stagnation in Ireland's development landscape.
Originally published by Irish Times. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.