DistantNews
Support us

Academic Suggests Letting Grades Break SAE Ties: “Problem Solved”

From Cooperativa · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Analysis Named sources Context piece
  • Catholic University academic Gabriel Gutiérrez says the government’s proposed reform of Chile’s School Admissions System is an unnecessarily long response to a relatively simple problem.
  • He warns that prioritizing academic criteria could increase school segregation, which his research says has been declining in Chile.
  • Gutiérrez proposes using grades or class ranking to break ties between applicants with the same priority instead of relying on chance.

Gabriel Gutiérrez, an academic at the Catholic University’s Faculty of Education, says the government is taking “a long road” to address a problem in Chile’s School Admissions System, known as SAE, that could be solved more simply.

a long road

· Gabriel GutiérrezHe describes the government’s proposed reform as an unnecessarily extensive response to a relatively simple issue.

Gutiérrez co-authored research concluding that if the executive’s still-unspecific proposal continues with a logic of prioritizing academic performance, it could increase school segregation. He noted that segregation in Chile has been declining, calling that trend unusual in the international context.

He said the research does not argue that the SAE must remain exactly as it is. One objection to the system is that when students share the same priority level, it uses a random draw to decide which applicants receive places. Gutiérrez argues that academic performance should determine the tie instead.

Let’s reward the student with the better performance.

· Gabriel GutiérrezHe summarizes the rationale he attributes to the government’s proposal to give greater weight to academic results.

“I understand that the government’s initiative has a reason for saying, ‘Let’s reward the student with the better performance,’” he said. But he criticized the broader approach as an attempt to dismantle the existing system when a narrower change could have achieved the same goal. The government could simply have said that the place goes to the applicant with the stronger academic position or higher class ranking, he argued. “Then you remove the random factor when selecting places at a school, and instead of drawing what people see as a lottery, you say, ‘Let the student with the better grade get the place,’ and the whole problem is solved.”

Then you remove the random factor when selecting places at a school, and instead of drawing what people see as a lottery, you say, ‘Let the student with the better grade get the place,’ and the whole problem is solved.

· Gabriel GutiérrezHe proposes using academic performance as the tie-breaker for school places instead of chance.
About this summary

Originally published by Cooperativa in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.