After 96 weeks: Sabalenka's No. 1 ranking in danger after shock defeat
Translated from Danish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Aryna Sabalenka's reign as world number one in tennis is under threat after a surprising defeat.
- The Belarusian player lost to 20-year-old Sara Bejlek at the WTA 1000 tournament in Cincinnati.
- Elena Rybakina could take the top ranking if she reaches the final.
Aryna Sabalenka's dominant run as the world's top-ranked women's tennis player is facing a significant challenge following a shocking upset at the WTA 1000 tournament in Cincinnati. For the seventh consecutive tournament, Sabalenka was eliminated before reaching the later stages, losing 6-7, 4-6 to the unseeded 20-year-old Czech player Sara Bejlek. This marks Bejlek's first career victory against a top-10 opponent. Sabalenka has held the world number one ranking for 96 consecutive weeks. However, following this defeat, she risks being overtaken by Elena Rybakina, the reigning Australian Open champion. Rybakina, from Kazakhstan, needs to reach the Cincinnati final to claim the top spot for the first time in her career. Her path includes a quarterfinal match against former world number one Iga Swiatek, and potentially world number three Jessica Pegula in the semifinals. Bejlek's victory was particularly dramatic, as she came back from significant deficits in both sets. In the first set tiebreak, Sabalenka led 5-1 but ultimately lost 7-9. In the second set, Sabalenka held a 4-1 advantage before Bejlek staged a remarkable comeback. "I'm totally lost for words. I just kept believing in it, and that was the key," Bejlek stated after the match. "She played incredible tennis, but I kept believing, fighting, and trying my best."
I'm totally lost for words. I just kept believing in it, and that was the key. She played incredible tennis, but I kept believing, fighting, and trying my best.
Originally published by Berlingske in Danish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.