DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India /Disasters & Emergencies

AI-171: A year on, no cause, no closure

From Hindustan Times · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Ongoing story
  • An update on the investigation into Air India flight AI-171's crash is expected nearly a year after the accident.
  • The update will detail progress but will not establish the cause, which remains disputed between human error and mechanical fault.
  • The crash on June 12, 2025, killed 241 of 242 people on board and 19 on the ground, with one survivor.

Nearly a year after the tragic crash of Air India flight AI-171, an update on the investigation is expected from the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). The flight, which departed Ahmedabad for London Gatwick on June 12, 2025, with 242 people aboard, crashed shortly after takeoff. The accident claimed the lives of 241 passengers and crew, along with 19 people on the ground, with only one passenger surviving.

It is essentially an update that investigating authorities are expected to provide when a final report cannot be released within a year.

โ€” ministry officialExplaining the nature of the upcoming status update on the Air India flight AI-171 investigation.

According to officials, the upcoming update will outline the work completed and areas still under examination. However, it is not expected to provide a definitive cause for the crash. The central question, whether the fuel to both engines was intentionally cut or resulted from a mechanical fault, has divided investigators, pilots, and legal experts since the inquiry began.

Under Annex 13 of the International Civil Aviation Organization, states are required to publish a final report within a year of an accident or, failing that, issue a progress update. This update is shared with international stakeholders. However, the Federation of Indian Pilots has urged the civil aviation ministry not to release the update, warning it could exacerbate confusion rather than provide clarity. They fear that another inconclusive report will fuel further speculation about human intervention, building on the preliminary report's single sentence about the cockpit transcript.

It will provide a sense of where the investigation stands and the work that has been completed. But it should not be seen as a document that will establish the cause of the accident.

โ€” ministry officialClarifying the limited scope of the expected investigation update.

What is known is that the cockpit voice recorder captured a pilot asking why fuel to an engine was cut off, with the other pilot responding that he had not done so. Both engines lost power, leading to the Boeing 787-8's descent onto a college canteen. The preliminary report, released a month after the crash, documented these details, but the examination of the engines is still ongoing, leaving the ultimate cause of the disaster unresolved.

In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so.

โ€” AAIB preliminary reportDetailing the exchange heard on the cockpit voice recorder shortly before the crash.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hindustan Times. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.