AIPAC is the top issue at final primary debate between Stevens and El-Sayed in Michigan

In the final debate before Michigan's Democratic primary, US Rep. Haley Stevens and challenger Abdul El-Sayed clashed fiercely, with the pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC's record spending becoming the central point of contention. El-Sayed repeatedly accused Stevens of being a "reliable vote" for AIPAC, citing her vote against a House amendment to strip military aid to Israel. He argued that AIPAC's support indicates Stevens will prioritize the lobby group's agenda over Palestinian self-determination.

“

I have been very clear, consistent and transparent, and I have continued to be.

Stevens, however, repeatedly dodged direct questions about AIPAC's spending and her relationship with the group. She instead emphasized her pride in representing a large Jewish community in her district and her commitment to peace. When pressed, Stevens deflected by pointing to "super PACs" supporting El-Sayed, suggesting a similar dynamic in the race. She also criticized El-Sayed's stance on foreign aid.

“

I am deeply proud to represent one of the largest Jewish populations in a congressional district in the country. This is a community that I grieve alongside, that I have mourned alongside, and have fought to bring the hostages home. And I’m still looking to get us to long-term peace.

The debate also touched on campaign finance more broadly, with Stevens facing criticism for a misstatement about utility company funding. El-Sayed continued his attacks, suggesting Stevens's positions were influenced by AIPAC's advertising, which he characterized as misleading. The exchange highlighted the deep divisions within the Democratic party over policy toward Israel ahead of the August 4 primary.

“

I don’t think there’s much difference between super PACs going in for Abdul and super PACs going in for me.