DistantNews
Support us
Alberta lawyer says referendum questions about immigration ‘harmful,’ ‘unnecessary’

Alberta lawyer says referendum questions about immigration ‘harmful,’ ‘unnecessary’

From Global News · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • An Alberta lawyer calls referendum questions on immigration "harmful" and "unnecessary," criticizing the government's narrative.
  • The questions propose increased provincial control over immigration and potential withholding of social services from non-citizens.
  • Political science experts note that these issues are not currently top concerns for Albertans, who are more focused on affordability and healthcare.

Referendum questions concerning immigration in Alberta are being labeled "harmful, racist, and unnecessary" by a local lawyer, who argues they promote an anti-immigrant sentiment. Avnish Nanda, who co-founded the pro-immigration group "Our Alberta Advantage," expressed dismay over the questions, stating they create confusion and anger.

As more people learn about it, they become angry over the amount of money being spent on this unnecessarily. And as they dig deeper into the questions and the ramifications, (it’s) just confusion. We don’t need this.

— Avnish NandaDescribing the public's reaction to the referendum questions on immigration.

"As more people learn about it, they become angry over the amount of money being spent on this unnecessarily. And as they dig deeper into the questions and the ramifications, (it’s) just confusion. We don’t need this," Nanda said. He added that his organization is actively opposing the "anti-immigrant, anti-Canadian narrative that this government is peddling through this referendum initiative."

pushing back against this anti-immigrant, anti-Canadian narrative that this government is peddling through this referendum initiative.

— Avnish NandaStating the goal of his organization regarding the referendum.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has defended the immigration-related questions, suggesting that "not every newcomer is a net contributor" and blaming immigrants for straining provincial resources, despite a recent slowdown in immigration numbers. The referendum ballot includes nine questions, with five focusing on immigration reform. These propose increased provincial control and the possibility of withholding social services from individuals without "Alberta-approved immigration status."

not every newcomer is a net contributor

— Danielle SmithPremier of Alberta defending the immigration reform questions.

Experts suggest the referendum's focus may be misplaced. Brendan Boyd, an associate professor of political science at McEwen University, observed that while the government might have intended a broad debate, public attention remains fixed on other issues. "If you look at some of the polling over the last couple of months, I don’t know that any of these things are sort of top of mind for Albertans," Boyd stated. "It tends to be affordability. It tend to be concerns about health care and the economy and none of those things are really on the ballot in this referendum."

If you look at some of the polling over the last couple of months, I don’t know that any of these things are sort of top of mind for Albertans. It tends to be affordability. It tend to be concerns about health care and the economy and none of those things are really on the ballot in this referendum.

— Brendan BoydAn associate professor of political science commenting on Albertans' priorities versus the referendum topics.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Global News. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.