DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Crime & Justice

Anti-Corruption Agency Indicts Judge Ji Gwi-yeon Without Detention Over Alleged Entertainment at Hostess Bar

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Official statement In the courts

- South Koreaโ€™s Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials indicted Judge Ji Gwi-yeon for allegedly accepting 4.09 million won in entertainment from two lawyers in 2023.

The Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials indicted Judge Ji Gwi-yeon without detention over allegations that two lawyers paid 4.09 million won for entertainment at a reservation-only bar in Seoulโ€™s Gangnam district.

The agency charged Ji with violating South Koreaโ€™s Improper Solicitation and Graft Act. It alleges that, around August 2023, he accepted entertainment exceeding 1 million won on a single occasion. Ji reportedly denied the allegations, saying he did not remember the circumstances.

Investigators reviewed photographs reported by the media, financial records and Jiโ€™s taxi-use history. They identified two occasions when the same people gathered at the same location, questioned the business owner and other witnesses, determined the relevant dates, and obtained the partiesโ€™ financial transaction records.

The agency did not find evidence that the entertainment came in exchange for favorable treatment in court. It therefore did not indict the lawyers on bribery-related allegations and also declined to prosecute over a separate alleged entertainment incident in September 2024.

The agency said Ji had ruled in favor of a case at the appellate level in 2013 after a first-instance defeat, when one of the lawyers had represented the case. But it concluded that the 10-year gap between that ruling and the alleged entertainment made it insufficient to establish a quid pro quo for his earlier official duties.

Although Judge Ji Gwi-yeon ruled in favor at the appellate level in a case lost at first instance in 2013, when one of the donorsโ€™ lawyers represented it, the 10-year gap from the alleged entertainment and other circumstances were insufficient to regard it as payment for his past official duties.

· Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking OfficialsThe agency explained why it did not pursue a bribery charge.
About this summary

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.