DistantNews
Support us
Appeal court acquits nonmedical eyebrow tattooist after Supreme Court ruling
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Crime & Justice

Appeal court acquits nonmedical eyebrow tattooist after Supreme Court ruling

From Dong-A Ilbo · () Korean

Translated from Korean and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Official statement Outcome reported
  • The Gwangju District Court overturned the conviction of a nonmedical eyebrow tattooist and entered an acquittal.
  • The appeals ruling followed a Supreme Court en banc decision that ordinary cosmetic tattooing by nonmedical practitioners does not constitute unlicensed medical practice.
  • The defendant had operated a tattoo business in Gwangju and performed eyebrow tattoos for 950 customers between October 2020 and July 2022.

A South Korean appeals court has overturned the conviction of a nonmedical practitioner who performed eyebrow tattoos, ruling that the procedures fell within ordinary cosmetic tattooing.

The Gwangju District Courtโ€™s Criminal Division 3 overturned the original judgment and acquitted the defendant, identified as A, in a decision announced on Sept. 1. A had been prosecuted under the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes.

The decision followed a ruling by the Supreme Courtโ€™s en banc panel in May. The Supreme Court found that ordinary cosmetic tattooing by nonmedical practitioners does not amount to unlicensed medical practice under the Medical Service Act.

The appeals court acknowledged that A had tattooed customers at a business operated in Seo-gu, Gwangju. But it said the conduct did not constitute the medical practice prohibited under Article 27, Paragraph 1 of the Medical Service Act, and found that the lower court had misunderstood the applicable law.

Prosecutors alleged that A operated the tattoo business from October 2020 through July 2022, performing eyebrow tattoos for 950 customers and charging between 150,000 won and 280,000 won per person.

The fact that the defendant performed eyebrow tattoo procedures on customers at a business he operated is acknowledged, but this constitutes ordinary cosmetic tattooing and does not amount to medical practice prohibited under Article 27, Paragraph 1 of the Medical Service Act. The original judgment contains an error in the application of the law.

โ€” Gwangju District CourtThe appeals court explained why it overturned the conviction and issued an acquittal.
About this summary

Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.