DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark /Elections & Politics

Appeals court rejects Trump's attempt to restrict mail-in voting

From Berlingske · () Danish

Translated from Danish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News From a news agency In the courts
  • A federal appeals court in Boston rejected the Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting in 23 states.
  • The court upheld a lower court's ban on key parts of President Trump's order, deeming them unconstitutional.
  • This decision impacts the rules for mail-in voting ahead of the U.S. midterm elections in November.

A federal appeals court in Boston has rejected the Trump administration's efforts to impose stricter rules on mail-in voting across 23 U.S. states. The decision upholds a preliminary injunction issued by a lower court on June 25, which had found significant portions of President Donald Trump's decree to be unconstitutional.

The administration had sought to lift the existing ban, aiming to implement its revised regulations for the upcoming midterm elections in November. However, the appeals court's ruling means that the previous, less restrictive rules for mail-in ballots will likely remain in effect in the affected states.

This legal setback for the Trump administration comes as the U.S. prepares for the November elections, where control of the House of Representatives and a third of the Senate seats are up for grabs. President Trump has frequently voiced concerns about the integrity of mail-in voting, suggesting it is prone to fraud.

The ruling can be appealed to the Supreme Court, which will then decide whether to take up the case. The outcome of such legal challenges could have a significant bearing on the electoral process and the administration's ability to shape voting procedures.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Berlingske in Danish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.