DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States /Culture & Society

Appeals court upholds block on immigration arrests at certain houses of worship

From CBS News · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • A federal appeals court has upheld a block on a Department of Homeland Security policy that would have allowed immigration arrests at certain houses of worship.
  • The ruling preserves a preliminary injunction preventing the policy's application to Quaker, Cooperative Baptist, and Sikh congregations.
  • The court found the policy substantially burdens the free exercise of religion, citing a chilling effect on attendance and communal worship.

A federal appeals court has maintained a block on a Department of Homeland Security policy that permitted immigration arrests at specific houses of worship. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit unanimously decided to keep a district court's preliminary injunction in place while the case proceeds.

is having a chilling effect on their congregations and already has caused declines in attendance among members of [Cooperative Baptist Fellowship] and the Sikh Plaintiffs.

โ€” Judge Barbara Milano KeenanJudge Barbara Milano Keenan described the impact of the DHS policy on religious attendance.

The injunction, initially issued last year, prevents the Trump administration from enforcing its policy against congregations from the Quaker, Sikh, and Cooperative Baptist Fellowship traditions. In the court's written decision, Judge Barbara Milano Keenan stated that the houses of worship successfully demonstrated that the DHS policy significantly burdens their religious freedom.

Keenan noted that the policy has created a "chilling effect on their congregations" and has already led to decreased attendance among members of the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship and Sikh plaintiffs. This decline in attendance, coupled with the heightened threat of immigration enforcement at these religious sites, "has already imposed a substantial burden on the ability of all the plaintiffs to express their religion through communal worship," the judge wrote.

already has imposed a substantial burden on the ability of all the plaintiffs to express their religion through communal worship.

โ€” Judge Barbara Milano KeenanJudge Barbara Milano Keenan explained how the policy affects religious expression.

The dispute originated early in President Trump's second administration when DHS reversed a previous policy that prohibited immigration enforcement actions at or near sensitive locations like places of worship. The new guidance allowed immigration officers discretion in conducting arrests in these areas. The plaintiffs, including the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship, Gurdwara Sahib West Sacramento, and several Quaker Meetings, argued that the policy violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the First Amendment by discouraging immigrants from attending services.

criminals will no longer be able to hide in America's schools and churches to avoid arrest.

โ€” DHS spokespersonA DHS statement from January 2025, cited by the court, explained the rationale for the policy change.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by CBS News. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.