Apple says UK App Store proposal amounts to price regulation
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Apple argues that proposed UK rules for its App Store would constitute price regulation and harm innovation.
- The company stated that allowing app developers to direct users to outside payment options could undermine its business model.
- Apple claims its App Store facilitated over ยฃ46.5 billion in UK sales in 2025, with commissions under 3.5%, and that changes won't lower consumer prices.
Apple is pushing back against proposed UK regulations for its App Store, arguing that the rules amount to price regulation and could stifle innovation. The tech giant submitted its concerns to Britain's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), stating that plans to loosen its control over in-app payments would give the regulator an "highly intrusive" role in managing its business.
Apple said on Wednesday that proposed UK rules governing its App Store would amount to price regulation, arguing that plans to loosen its control over in-app payments could undermine innovation and investment.
The CMA's proposed measures, part of an effort to boost competition and consumer choice, would allow app developers to guide users toward payment options outside of Apple's and Google's app stores. The proposals also suggest that any fees charged for such "steering" must be fair and reasonable. Apple contends that these requirements go beyond promoting competition.
In its submission, Apple highlighted the significant economic activity facilitated by its App Store, reporting over ยฃ46.5 billion ($61.8 billion) in UK billings and sales in 2025. The company noted that commissions from these sales accounted for less than 3.5% of the total. Apple also asserted that there is no evidence to suggest that altering its payment model would lead to lower prices for consumers.
Under the (consultation), the CMA would not only regulate Apple's prices, but also restrict the products and services for which Apple can charge a commission.
However, the Coalition for App Fairness, represented by Gene Burrus, countered Apple's arguments. Burrus stated that Apple's position overlooks the barriers developers face and accused the company of using its dominant platform position to create unfair competitive advantages. Apple has previously maintained that developers already have alternative methods for transacting with users off its platform. The CMA's consultation is a key part of Britain's new digital markets regime, which grants the watchdog authority to impose specific requirements on companies deemed to have "strategic market status," with Apple and Google having been designated last year.
Apple is using its position as the dominant platform gatekeeper to give itself unfair and unwarranted competitive advantages.
Originally published by CNA. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.