DistantNews
Support us
Argentina's ruling party withdraws signatures from controversial ecocide bill
🇦🇷 Argentina /Crime & Justice

Argentina's ruling party withdraws signatures from controversial ecocide bill

From La Nación · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources New plan
  • Argentine senators from La Libertad Avanza (LLA) withdrew their signatures from a controversial ecocide bill after facing strong opposition from agricultural and productive sectors.
  • The bill, which proposed up to 25 years in prison for ecocide, had advanced through Senate committees but sparked widespread criticism over its potential impact on economic activities.
  • Minister Patricia Bullrich stated the government would revisit the initiative later, emphasizing a need for dialogue with affected sectors and clarifying the bill's original intent was to target intentional forest fires, not productive activities.

A controversial bill to criminalize ecocide in Argentina has been shelved after key senators withdrew their support. The initiative, which proposed penalties of up to 25 years in prison, faced a significant backlash from agricultural and productive organizations, prompting a swift retreat by the ruling La Libertad Avanza (LLA) party.

We are going to withdraw this opinion and call on the sectors, but at a later date.

— Patricia BullrichMinister Patricia Bullrich confirmed the withdrawal of signatures from the ecocide bill and indicated plans for future dialogue.

The bill had secured a favorable opinion from the Senate's Justice and Criminal Affairs and Environment and Sustainable Development committees. However, its details quickly ignited controversy, particularly concerning its potential implications for investments and various economic activities. The opposition from powerful agricultural lobbies was a decisive factor in the government's decision to backtrack.

Minister Patricia Bullrich confirmed the withdrawal of LLA signatures, stating, "We are going to withdraw this opinion and call on the sectors, but at a later date." She explained that the government intends to revisit the initiative after further dialogue. Bullrich had previously attempted to assuage concerns, suggesting the bill would undergo substantial modifications, becoming "practically another project."

What is sought is that when there is a firm sentence against someone who set fire to a forest, there are consequences.

— Patricia BullrichExplaining the original intent of the ecocide bill, focusing on intentional forest fires.

Bullrich clarified that the original aim was to address intentional forest fires and other severe environmental offenses. "What is sought is that when there is a firm sentence against someone who set fire to a forest, there are consequences," she said. She stressed that the bill was not intended to harm the agricultural sector and would not proceed to the floor if it was not clear that it targeted intentional forest arsonists, asserting, "It has nothing to do with productivity."

It has nothing to do with productivity.

— Patricia BullrichReassuring that the bill was not intended to negatively impact the agricultural sector.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by La Nación in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.

More Stories

From Our Blog