DistantNews
Support us
Argentine Bar Associations Reject Government's Withdrawal of Judge Nominee

Argentine Bar Associations Reject Government's Withdrawal of Judge Nominee

From La Nación · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified New plan
  • Argentina's Bar Associations Federation (FACA) has expressed deep concern over the government's withdrawal of Judge María Verónica Michelli's nomination.
  • The decision, reportedly influenced by President Milei's sister Karina, stems from Michelli being the sister-in-law of a journalist who investigated sensitive cases.
  • Professional bodies argue the move creates uncertainty regarding judicial selection processes and undermines confidence in objective, transparent rules.

The Argentine Federation of Bar Associations (FACA) has voiced strong disapproval of the government's decision to withdraw the nomination of María Verónica Michelli for a federal judge position in La Plata. Michelli had successfully completed all constitutionally and legally mandated stages for the role.

Sources within the government indicate that the decision originated from Karina Milei, the Secretary General of the Presidency. The reason cited for the withdrawal is that Michelli is the sister-in-law of Hugo Alconada Mon, an investigative journalist for LA NACION known for his work on the $LIBRA and Adorni cases.

This intervention has drawn criticism not only from the opposition but also from within the ruling party, including Patricia Bullrich, who was seen with Karina Milei attempting to manage the fallout. The government initially tried to prevent the nomination from being debated in the Senate, despite it having already secured the necessary signatures for approval.

FACA stated that "the decision to withdraw a nomination after all foreseen stages have been completed generates uncertainty regarding the stability and predictability of judicial selection mechanisms." The federation emphasized that this action affects the confidence that should be inspired by a system based on objective, transparent rules that respect the separation of powers.

The organization further argued that the selection and appointment of magistrates are fundamental pillars of a republican system, requiring utmost respect for established institutional procedures. They highlighted that the completion of contests, technical evaluations, background checks, and public participation stages are designed to guarantee the suitability, independence, and legitimacy of judicial candidates.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by La Nación in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.