Bad Bunny's ex-partner wins favorable ruling in lawsuit over voice usage
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A former partner of Bad Bunny has won a favorable ruling in a lawsuit over the use of her voice.
- The Supreme Court of Puerto Rico determined she can claim image and copyright rights for her voice's inclusion in songs.
- The ruling allows her to pursue claims regarding the use of her voice in specific songs, though one claim was dismissed due to statute of limitations.
Carliz de la Cruz Hernรกndez, an ex-partner of global music star Bad Bunny, has secured a significant legal victory. The Supreme Court of Puerto Rico ruled that she has the right to claim image and copyright for the use of her voice in the artist's music.
The court's decision allows de la Cruz Hernรกndez to pursue her case, which centers on the iconic phrase "Bad Bunny, baby" featured in the songs "Pa ti" and "Dos Mil 16." The ruling, detailed in a 50-page opinion by Associate Justice Mildred Pabรณn, found that the plaintiff presented sufficient facts to justify her claim.
De la Cruz Hernรกndez, a lawyer by profession, met Benito Antonio Martรญnez Ocasio, Bad Bunny's real name, in 2011. They had an intermittent relationship until 2016. During this period, in 2015, she recorded the audio clip at the singer's request.
While the Supreme Court dismissed a $40 million claim related to the song "Pa ti" (2016) due to the statute of limitations, the ruling on "Dos Mil 16" allows her case to proceed. This decision could set a precedent for artists regarding the use of vocal samples and personal recordings in music.
The plaintiff has presented sufficient facts to offer in due course the evidence that justifies this claim. In view of this, the lower courts erred in dismissing the cause of action under the Moral Rights Law.
Originally published by Cooperativa in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.