DistantNews
Support us
Barbados High Court dismisses Rastafari cannabis constitutional challenge
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Jamaica /Elections & Politics

Barbados High Court dismisses Rastafari cannabis constitutional challenge

From Jamaica Observer · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • Barbados High Court dismissed a constitutional challenge to the Sacramental Cannabis Act.
  • The ruling stated that restrictions on cannabis use for Rastafarians do not violate religious freedom.
  • The claimant, Paul Rock, expressed disappointment and plans to appeal the decision.

The Barbados High Court has rejected a constitutional challenge brought by a Rastafarian man seeking to use cannabis during religious ceremonies. Paul Rock argued that the country's Sacramental Cannabis Act unlawfully infringed upon his religious freedom, preventing him from practicing his faith fully. He also contended that the 2019 law failed to accommodate Rastafari women who observe specific practices during menstruation. Rock claimed the legislation breached several constitutional rights, including freedom of conscience, religion, and protection against discrimination. However, Justice Michelle Weekes dismissed the claims, stating that the restrictions do not violate religious freedom. The court denied the declarations sought by Rock, with written reasons to be provided later. Rock described the ruling as deeply disappointing, feeling it was delivered without immediate justification. "I canโ€™t help but feeling that after five years and various delays and the setbacks, just to come and say itโ€™s denied with no reason and to come back for the reason later, it seems like more than a slap in the face," he told reporters. He emphasized that partial constitutional rights are akin to a full denial. Rock confirmed his intention to appeal the decision within the 28-day deadline, seeking assistance from the Legal Aid Department. His attorney acknowledged the unpredictability of challenges to the status quo but was not entirely surprised by the outcome.

I canโ€™t help but feeling that after five years and various delays and the setbacks, just to come and say itโ€™s denied with no reason and to come back for the reason later, it seems like more than a slap in the face.

โ€” Paul RockThe claimant expressed his deep disappointment with the High Court's ruling and its delivery.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jamaica Observer. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.