Betrayal and Being Betrayed: Social Psychology Study Deeply Analyzes Backstabbing Mechanisms

Betrayal, a common human experience, is rarely the act of a dangerous sociopath or a "narcissistic pervert," as commonly portrayed, according to social psychologist Fanny Lalot. In her book, "Trahir et être trahi: Analyse psycho-sociale du coup de poignard dans le dos," Lalot delves into the psychological underpinnings of backstabbing.

“

we always tend to overestimate our tormentor's responsibility.

Lalot identifies the "fundamental attribution error" as a key bias. This cognitive tendency leads individuals to overestimate a betrayer's personal responsibility while underestimating the influence of external circumstances. The book suggests this bias stems from a desire for a more predictable world, where individuals are seen as fully in control of their actions, aligning with societal emphasis on freedom and self-determination.

“

we tend to consider them fully responsible for their act, underestimating the role that particular circumstances may have played.

Contrary to popular belief, Lalot asserts that betrayals are widespread and often committed by ordinary individuals, not just those with severe personality disorders. She critiques the overused and often unfounded term "narcissistic pervert," clarifying that modern research does not support it as a clinically defined condition. The study posits that betrayals are a complex interplay of individual choices and situational factors, making them a universal aspect of human interaction.

“

considering humans capable of controlling their behavior 'makes the world more predictable'.