Bjørn Lomborg: How much of the world is actually burning? Data they don't want us to know

Devastating wildfires in France and Spain have resulted in catastrophic consequences, forcing over 220,000 people to flee flames in southwestern France and burning an area twice the size of Madrid near the Spanish capital, displacing nearly 90,000 residents. Those who have lost homes and livelihoods deserve sympathy and, crucially, improved policies for fire prevention and suppression.

However, the narrative accompanying these tragedies often centers on climate change. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez called the fires a "painful manifestation" of climate change. The British and Spanish governments quickly issued a joint statement declaring climate change a "national security emergency" that threatens our way of life. The conclusion seemed predetermined: only ending fossil fuel use could extinguish the flames.

“

The fires are a painful manifestation of climate change.

Bjørn Lomborg, president of the Copenhagen Consensus think tank, contends that this climate-centric discourse, while perhaps well-intentioned, overshadows the immediate need for effective fire management. He suggests that the constant emphasis on climate change as the singular culprit may hinder the implementation of practical, localized solutions for preventing and combating fires. The focus, Lomborg implies, should shift towards tangible actions in land management, infrastructure, and emergency response, rather than solely on global climate policy.

“

Climate change is now a national security emergency that threatens our way of life.