DistantNews
Support us
Bolivian Court to Rule on Ex-Minister's Challenge to Censure

Bolivian Court to Rule on Ex-Minister's Challenge to Censure

From El Deber · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Under investigation
  • Bolivia's Constitutional Court will decide on Monday whether to grant precautionary measures to former Economy Minister José Espinoza.
  • Espinoza seeks to annul a censure motion passed by the Legislative Assembly on August 18, arguing it violated his fundamental rights.
  • Legislators from the Libre party are urging the court to respect the Assembly's decision, warning of legal action if it does not.

Bolivia's Constitutional Court is set to rule on Monday on a request for precautionary measures filed by former Economy Minister José Espinoza. Espinoza is challenging a censure motion passed against him by the Legislative Assembly on August 18, which he claims violated his fundamental rights.

Espinoza, who was absent during the session where he was to be questioned, filed a constitutional protection action against the president of the Legislative Assembly, Edmand Lara, and 165 senators and deputies. He argues that the censure was issued in his absence and outside the constitutional framework. Espinoza contends that a censure requires the presence of all 166 members of the Assembly, whereas the vote against him involved only 129 assembly members, with 91 voting in favor of his removal.

Meanwhile, legislators from the Libre party are calling on the Constitutional Court to uphold the Legislative Assembly's decision. They have warned of potential legal proceedings if the court sides with Espinoza and overturns the censure motion. The case highlights ongoing tensions between different branches of government and the interpretation of constitutional procedures in Bolivia.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by El Deber in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.