DistantNews
Support us
Bricks & Minifigs inventory dispute highlighted amid LEGO controversy
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India /Crime & Justice

Bricks & Minifigs inventory dispute highlighted amid LEGO controversy

From Times of India · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • A former franchise owner claims Bricks & Minifigs (BAM) failed to provide a complete inventory list after taking over his store.
  • The dispute has gained online attention through YouTuber investigations, with focus shifting to the store's inventory at the time of takeover.
  • The former owners allege a conflict of interest during the asset evaluation and claim they lost access to crucial business records.

A former franchise owner is spotlighting a dispute with Bricks & Minifigs (BAM), alleging the company never provided a full inventory list after taking control of his Salem, Oregon store. Benjamin Gorman claims BAM promised a list but failed to deliver, a crucial document he believes is key to the ongoing legal battle.

One missing document could become one of the most important pieces in the growing Bricks & Minifigs dispute.

โ€” Benjamin GormanGorman's assessment of the importance of the inventory list.

Gorman's comments emerge as the case draws significant attention online, amplified by investigations from YouTubers Reckless Ben and Coffeezilla. While Coffeezilla's review suggested the amount of missing LEGO might be less than initially thought, he noted that the original owner could still be owed substantial sums from alleged unpaid sales. The focus, according to Gorman and former co-owner Crystal Law, is now on the inventory that existed when BAM assumed control.

Bricks & Minifigs never provided a full inventory list after taking control of the store, despite allegedly promising one.

โ€” Benjamin GormanGorman's primary accusation against Bricks & Minifigs.

During a podcast appearance with Law, Gorman recounted that BAM promised a detailed inventory on the night of the takeover. This list was important, he stated, as it would have allowed former owners to challenge the figures with an independent evaluator. Gorman also alleged that BAM did not use an impartial representative for the asset evaluation, claiming Brandon Best, who later operated the store, was involved despite potential conflicts of interest, as he and Joshua Johnson had allegedly already been slated to purchase the store.

The increased attention has helped their legal fundraising effort, which has raised more than $80,000.

โ€” Benjamin GormanGorman discussing the impact of online attention on their fundraising.

Law and Gorman also contested BAM's claim that they abandoned the business. They stated they signed no ownership transfer or franchise termination paperwork. Law added that they lost access to vital records, including emails, insurance, and tax documents, after BAM took over. She explained that some items belonging to Bryan Mansell were sold just before the takeover but hadn't been fully reconciled, as she expected to update records and pay him later.

BAM promised to provide a detailed inventory list on the night it assumed control of the store.

โ€” Benjamin GormanGorman detailing the alleged broken promise regarding inventory.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Times of India in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.