DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Culture & Society

Bronx Zoo elephant 'Happy,' central to animal rights lawsuit, euthanized at 55

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • Happy, an Asian elephant who lived at the Bronx Zoo for over 50 years, was euthanized on May 26 at the age of 55 due to old age and declining health.
  • Happy was the central figure in a 2018 lawsuit filed by the Nonhuman Right Project, which sought to recognize her as a "non-human person" and grant her freedom.
  • Despite the legal battle, the court ultimately denied the request to transfer Happy to a sanctuary, though two judges dissented, calling her confinement "unjust and inhumane."

Happy, an Asian elephant who spent more than five decades at the Bronx Zoo, was euthanized on May 26 at the age of 55. The New York Wildlife Conservation Society, which operates the zoo, stated that Happy had been receiving hospice care for age-related health deterioration, including declining kidney and liver function.

Happy died peacefully surrounded by the keepers, curators, and veterinarians who cared for her for over 30 years.

โ€” Craig PiperBronx Zoo interim director, describing the circumstances of Happy's euthanasia.

"After a continuous evaluation of Happy's health and quality of life, it became clear that her illness due to old age had worsened, leading to a difficult decision," said Bronx Zoo interim director Craig Piper. "She died peacefully surrounded by the keepers, curators, and veterinarians who cared for her for over 30 years."

Happy gained prominence in 2018 when the Nonhuman Right Project filed a habeas corpus lawsuit demanding her freedom. The organization argued that elephants, possessing high cognitive abilities, emotions, and self-awareness, should be considered subjects of rights rather than mere property. They contended that Happy, having been "unjustly detained" for over 40 years, should be released to a sanctuary.

The organization argued that elephants, possessing high cognitive abilities, emotions, and self-awareness, should be considered subjects of rights rather than mere property.

โ€” Nonhuman Right ProjectThe core argument presented in their lawsuit seeking freedom for Happy.

This legal effort aimed to apply the writ of habeas corpus, traditionally used for humans unlawfully detained, to non-human animals. Happy had previously passed the mirror test in 2005, a cognitive test demonstrating self-recognition, a feat achieved only by a few species at the time. Despite the lawsuit, which lasted about four years, the court ultimately denied the request for her transfer. In 2022, the New York Supreme Court, by a 5-2 majority, dismissed the group's claims. However, two dissenting judges described Happy's confinement as "inherently unjust and inhumane" and "an affront to civilized society."

Her confinement is inherently unjust and inhumane and an affront to civilized society.

โ€” Dissenting JudgeExpressing disagreement with the court's decision to deny Happy's transfer to a sanctuary.

While Happy's legal bid for freedom was unsuccessful, her case has been remembered as a significant step in the legal fight for animal rights. The Nonhuman Right Project's executive director, Christopher Berry, stated, "Happy's suffering will not be in vain. She will forever be remembered as the elephant who opened the door for legal rights for animals."

Happy's suffering will not be in vain. She will forever be remembered as the elephant who opened the door for legal rights for animals.

โ€” Christopher BerryExecutive Director of the Nonhuman Right Project, reflecting on Happy's legacy.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.