Buenos Aires' unrealized 19th-century canal project: A water boundary that never was
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A 19th-century project proposed a 15-kilometer canal to encircle Buenos Aires, functioning as a water-based boundary similar to the General Paz highway.
- The plan, conceived by engineer Pablo Blot, aimed to create industrial hubs and worker housing along its banks, but it was never realized.
- The canal would have spanned from the Rio de la Plata to the Riachuelo, following the path of the Maldonado stream, and would have significantly altered the city's layout.
In 1886, Buenos Aires envisioned a monumental engineering feat: the Gran Canal de Circunvalaciรณn, a 15-kilometer waterway designed to encircle the city's urban core. This ambitious project, conceived by engineer Pablo Blot, aimed to serve as a distinct boundary, akin to a water-filled version of the General Paz highway, separating the burgeoning metropolis from its surrounding rural areas.
The plan detailed a semicircular canal approximately 60 meters wide with 15-meter docks on each side, reaching a depth of 4.5 meters. Its proposed route would have started at the Rio de la Plata near the current Aeroparque, followed the Maldonado stream (now Avenida Juan B. Justo), and connected to the Riachuelo in the south. The project also included plans for industrial zones, factories, and worker housing along its 200-meter-wide corridor, fostering development on the city's periphery.
Had it been built, the canal would have profoundly reshaped Buenos Aires. Instead of a simple boundary, it would have divided the city, necessitating five strategic bridges to connect the newly formed districts. The vision was for a city integrated with industrial activity and planned worker settlements along its new aquatic artery, a stark contrast to its eventual development.
Originally published by La Naciรณn in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.