DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium /Crime & Justice

Butcher, 68, again sentenced to five years for killing former son-in-law

From VRT NWS · () Dutch

Translated from Dutch and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • Antwerpโ€™s court of appeal upheld a five-year prison sentence for a 68-year-old butcher from Ham who fatally stabbed his former son-in-law in 2022.
  • The court rejected his claim of lawful self-defense and found that he had intentionally killed the victim after opening his door during the confrontation.
  • He must also pay the civil parties more than โ‚ฌ66,000 in compensation.

A 68-year-old butcher from Ham has again received a five-year prison sentence for fatally stabbing his former son-in-law, after an appeals court rejected his claim of lawful self-defense.

The confrontation took place at the butcherโ€™s front door on Sunday, October 30, 2022. The former son-in-law, from Olen, had previously been subject to a contact ban but went to the house because he wanted to retrieve his pellet stove. He arrived by bicycle carrying a stick.

The argument escalated, and the butcher stabbed him with a 29-centimeter filleting knife that had been lying on a radiator. The two men had a history of tensions following the breakdown of the younger manโ€™s relationship with the butcherโ€™s daughter.

He stood with a club at the door and had previously received a six-month contact ban. He did not come by for a chat.

โ€” Defense argumentThe explanation offered in support of the butcherโ€™s self-defense claim.

The butcher appealed his original conviction, arguing that he had acted in self-defense because the victim stood outside with a club and had previously received a six-month contact ban. The appeals court rejected that argument. It found that the defendant had been safe behind a door, yet chose to open it. The house also had an alarm system.

The court upheld the five-year sentence imposed in May 2025 and ordered the defendant to pay the civil parties more than โ‚ฌ66,000. Philip Daeninck, the civil partiesโ€™ lawyer, welcomed the decision, saying they were relieved that the court had found intentional killing with premeditation rather than lawful self-defense.

We are mainly relieved that the court found intentional killing with premeditation. There was therefore no lawful self-defense, as the defense had argued.

โ€” Philip DaeninckThe lawyer for the civil parties reacted to the appeals ruling.
About this summary

Originally published by VRT NWS in Dutch. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.