Butcher, 68, again sentenced to five years for killing former son-in-law
Translated from Dutch and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Antwerpโs court of appeal upheld a five-year prison sentence for a 68-year-old butcher from Ham who fatally stabbed his former son-in-law in 2022.
- The court rejected his claim of lawful self-defense and found that he had intentionally killed the victim after opening his door during the confrontation.
- He must also pay the civil parties more than โฌ66,000 in compensation.
A 68-year-old butcher from Ham has again received a five-year prison sentence for fatally stabbing his former son-in-law, after an appeals court rejected his claim of lawful self-defense.
The confrontation took place at the butcherโs front door on Sunday, October 30, 2022. The former son-in-law, from Olen, had previously been subject to a contact ban but went to the house because he wanted to retrieve his pellet stove. He arrived by bicycle carrying a stick.
The argument escalated, and the butcher stabbed him with a 29-centimeter filleting knife that had been lying on a radiator. The two men had a history of tensions following the breakdown of the younger manโs relationship with the butcherโs daughter.
He stood with a club at the door and had previously received a six-month contact ban. He did not come by for a chat.
The butcher appealed his original conviction, arguing that he had acted in self-defense because the victim stood outside with a club and had previously received a six-month contact ban. The appeals court rejected that argument. It found that the defendant had been safe behind a door, yet chose to open it. The house also had an alarm system.
The court upheld the five-year sentence imposed in May 2025 and ordered the defendant to pay the civil parties more than โฌ66,000. Philip Daeninck, the civil partiesโ lawyer, welcomed the decision, saying they were relieved that the court had found intentional killing with premeditation rather than lawful self-defense.
We are mainly relieved that the court found intentional killing with premeditation. There was therefore no lawful self-defense, as the defense had argued.
Originally published by VRT NWS in Dutch. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.