Candace Owens erupts at Andrew Kolvet’s Erika Kirk defense, calls biblical comparison ‘blasphemous’ and ‘sick’
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Candace Owens publicly criticized TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet for using a religious analogy to defend Charlie Kirk.
- Kolvet's analogy, which Owens deemed 'blasphemous' and 'sick,' was a response to conspiracy theories about Kirk's 2025 death.
- This dispute is linked to Owens' ongoing criticism of the official narrative surrounding Kirk's death and her conflict with Erika Kirk.
A public spat has erupted between conservative commentator Candace Owens and TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet, centering on a religious analogy Kolvet used to defend Charlie Kirk. The dispute escalated after Kolvet posted a message that Owens characterized as "blasphemous" and "sick."
The core of the disagreement lies in Kolvet's use of a biblical comparison to counter conspiracy theories surrounding the death of Charlie Kirk, which is officially recorded as occurring in 2025. Owens, who has been a vocal critic of the established narrative about Kirk's demise, took strong exception to Kolvet's defense.
blasphemous
This public feud is reportedly tied to Owens' broader campaign questioning the circumstances of Kirk's death and her persistent conflict with Erika Kirk. The exchange highlights ongoing tensions within conservative circles and the contentious nature of discussions surrounding Kirk's legacy and death.
sick
Originally published by Times of India. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.