Candidates will maintain the same position on the ballot for Colombia's second round
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Candidates in Colombia's June 21 presidential runoff will maintain their positions on the ballot from the first round.
- The "voto en blanco" (blank vote) option will occupy the right side of the ballot, having received over 400,000 votes in the first round.
- Official results show Abelardo de la Espriella leading with 10.3 million votes, followed by Ivรกn Cepeda with 9.7 million.
Candidates competing in Colombia's presidential runoff election on June 21 will retain their original ballot placements from the first round of voting, the National Civil Registry announced Friday. This logistical decision means the ballot design will remain the same despite a reduction in the number of candidates from the initial 13.
The officialist Pacto Histรณrico party's ticket, featuring presidential candidate Ivรกn Cepeda and vice-presidential aspirant Aรญda Quilcuรฉ, will appear on the far left of the ballot. On the other hand, right-leaning candidate Abelardo de la Espriella, representing the Defensores de la Patria movement, along with his running mate Josรฉ Manuel Restrepo, will be situated in the central section of the ballot.
The right-hand quadrant of the ballot will be exclusively reserved for the "voto en blanco" (blank vote) option. This choice garnered 406,970 votes, representing 1.71% of the total participation in the first round. The electoral authority reminded voters that marking more than one valid box on the ballot will result in an automatic annulment of the vote during the counting process.
According to consolidated final scrutiny data from the National Electoral Council (CNE), De la Espriella secured his place in the runoff by winning the most votes in the first round, with 10.3 million (43.78%). Ivรกn Cepeda followed, advancing to the second round with the support of 9.7 million voters (40.98%).
Originally published by El Nacional in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.