China is the 'Key' to Iran's Economic Isolation
Translated from Greek, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The US is implementing an 'Economic Outcast' strategy to isolate Iran financially, aiming to cut off all economic ties.
- This strategy faces significant challenges, particularly regarding China's role as a major buyer of Iranian oil.
- The effectiveness of the sanctions hinges on Beijing's willingness to cooperate, which currently appears unlikely.
The United States is pursuing a strategy of "economic isolation" against Iran, aiming to sever all financial lifelines that sustain the Islamic Republic. This initiative, described as an "unprecedented campaign," seeks to halt all financial transactions, including electronic fund transfers, illicit oil trade, and gold dealings involving Iran.
However, the feasibility of such comprehensive sanctions raises critical questions. Analysts question why these stringent measures were not employed before military actions, which ultimately failed to achieve their objectives of Iran surrendering enriched uranium or the regime collapsing. The current economic pressure campaign relies heavily on cutting off Iran's financial lifelines, but its success is deeply intertwined with the cooperation of China.
China's significant role as the primary purchaser of Iranian oil exports, accounting for 80% in 2025, presents a major hurdle. The US faces a potential confrontation with Beijing over issues ranging from artificial intelligence and Taiwan to China's rapid nuclear development and its impact on the global economy. Unlike the Normandy landings in 1944, which did not require Chinese participation, the current "economic landing" is deemed impossible without Beijing's involvement, and China shows no inclination to comply.
The economic landing of 2026 is not feasible without Beijing, which does not seem willing.
Past US attempts to pressure Beijing, such as threatening sanctions on Chinese companies trading with Iran, have been bypassed. Treasury Secretary Yellen's recent op-ed in the Financial Times, outlining sanctions against Iran, notably omitted any mention of China. While sanctions have historically yielded results, including the 2015 nuclear deal (which President Trump later rescinded), the current strategy's reliance on Chinese compliance appears precarious.
The article also touches upon the shifting rhetoric regarding regime change in Tehran. While President Trump previously pledged to create conditions for regime change, and Secretary Yellen reiterated this commitment, the timeline and methods appear to have evolved. The initial expectation of a swift conflict and Iran's "unconditional surrender" has given way to a more protracted economic strategy, the ultimate success of which remains uncertain without key international players like China on board.
Earlier this year, Trump had the opportunity to put hard pressure on Beijing, threatening Chinese companies with sanctions if they traded with Iran. Instead, Trump chose to impose an embargo on Iranian ships in the Persian Gulf.
Originally published by Kathimerini in Greek. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.