DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan /Conflict & Security

China's missiles not aimed at Taiwan, ex-official claims, sparking outrage

From Liberty Times · () Chinese

Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • Former Taipei County Magistrate Chou Hsi-wei claimed China's military strength protects Taiwan from foreign bullying and exploitation.
  • Chou asserted that China's missiles are not aimed at Taiwan and that Japan has not abandoned its colonial ambitions.
  • His remarks, shared by Chinese state media, drew widespread criticism and condemnation from Taiwanese netizens.

Former Taipei County Magistrate Chou Hsi-wei has ignited controversy with a series of statements suggesting China's military power serves as a protective shield for Taiwan against foreign interference. Chou argued that Beijing's military might is intended to prevent Taiwan from being bullied, exploited, or colonized by external forces.

In remarks amplified by the overseas social media account of China's People's Daily, Chou also asserted that China's missiles are not directed at Taiwan. He further claimed that Japan has never relinquished its desire to re-colonize Taiwan and that the United States continues to seek Taiwan's exploitation.

These statements have provoked a strong backlash from Taiwanese netizens. Comments flooded the People's Daily overseas account, with many users denouncing Chou's remarks as baseless and contradictory. Online reactions included accusations of spreading falsehoods and questioning the logic of being "protected" by a perceived threat.

The controversy highlights a significant divide in perspectives regarding China's intentions and Taiwan's security. Chou's comments, presented by Chinese state media, contrast sharply with the prevailing sentiment among many Taiwanese who view China's military activities as a direct threat.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.