China's trademark disputes: When Goliath sues David, public sympathy sides with the underdog
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A string of trademark lawsuits in China, including a high-profile case between Louis Vuitton and Molly Tea, has revealed a public disconnect with the law.
- Chinese brands are increasingly registering and enforcing trademarks under the country's first-to-file system, but aggressive enforcement risks public backlash.
- Consumers are showing sympathy for perceived underdogs, viewing these disputes as a stand for Chinese culture against corporate overreach.
A recent wave of trademark lawsuits in China, notably the dispute between French luxury giant Louis Vuitton and popular beverage chain Molly Tea, has exposed a significant gap between legal rulings and public opinion. As Chinese brands gain prominence, companies are actively registering and defending their trademarks, leveraging China's first-to-file system which grants exclusive rights to the earliest registrant.
However, this assertive protection of intellectual property is increasingly drawing public criticism. Observers note a growing wave of sympathy for smaller, local businesses perceived as underdogs in these legal battles. This sentiment stems from concerns about corporate overreach and the monopolization of cultural symbols, with many Chinese consumers seeing these cases as a defense of national culture and art.
This pattern is so common, LV is being so petty. Are they poor now?
The Louis Vuitton versus Molly Tea case exemplifies this tension. A Suzhou court ruled that Molly Tea's floral logo infringed on Louis Vuitton's trademarks, ordering the Chinese chain to apologize and pay substantial damages. Molly Tea, with over 2,000 stores globally, argued that its logo drew on traditional Chinese motifs predating Louis Vuitton's signature monogram. The ruling ignited fierce debate on Chinese social media, with many netizens rallying behind Molly Tea, viewing the pattern as a common cultural element and Louis Vuitton's claim as petty.
This public support for Molly Tea reflects a broader trend known as 'guochao,' or national trend, which celebrates and promotes Chinese cultural influence. While legal experts point out that modern intellectual property law allows for the adaptation and trademarking of public domain elements if used distinctively, the public sentiment leans towards protecting local brands and cultural heritage against perceived foreign corporate dominance.
People used to, and often still do, see China as a copycat nation. Yet, Chinese designs and art have inspired brands globally. By supporting Molly Tea, Chinese consumers are taking a stand for Chinese culture and art.
Originally published by The Straits Times in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.