Christopher Nolan Explains What He Believes Is the Biggest Problem in Film Criticism Today
Translated from Serbian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Director Christopher Nolan identified a core issue in amateur online film criticism, stating it often misunderstands narrative storytelling.
- Nolan criticized the tendency for amateur reviewers to dismiss a narrative device simply because they recognize it.
- He noted that while some film patterns can become predictable and require evolution, this doesn't invalidate the shared language filmmakers use.
Filmmaker Christopher Nolan has pinpointed what he considers the "real problem" with amateur film criticism on the internet. The acclaimed director, currently enjoying success with his adaptation of Homer's "Odyssey," "Oppenheimer," believes many online critics fundamentally misunderstand how cinematic storytelling works.
Often films are criticized for not having a likable character, so the authors change them or manipulate their character in different ways.
Nolan, speaking on host Zong Shuai's podcast, highlighted a common pitfall: the insistence that characters must be likable. "Often films are criticized for not having a likable character, so the authors change them or manipulate their character in different ways," he explained. He argues that this perspective represents a fundamental flaw in how films are evaluated.
The fact that someone recognizes the way a story is told does not mean that procedure automatically becomes worthless.
"The fact that someone recognizes the way a story is told does not mean that procedure automatically becomes worthless," Nolan stated. He specifically addressed amateur critics who share their views on social media, suggesting they often believe identifying a narrative technique automatically disqualifies its effectiveness. "I think that's the real problem with today's criticism," he added.
I think that's the real problem with today's criticism.
However, Nolan acknowledged that certain cinematic patterns can indeed become overly predictable. "This can be true for individual elements. Film language evolves precisely because of this. When a formula becomes too familiar to the audience, it must change," he conceded. He emphasized that filmmakers utilize this shared cinematic language, building upon it because audiences are familiar with many films and understand how it functions.
I think primarily of amateur criticism. People believe that as soon as they recognize a certain narrative mechanism, they have proven that it is worthless.
Originally published by N1 Serbia in Serbian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.