Civil service reform: Yes, but the army must earn its recruits
Translated from French, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A referendum on June 14 will decide on reforms to make civil service less accessible, particularly for new army recruits.
- The reforms aim to address the declining number of soldiers in the Swiss army, exacerbated by the attractiveness of civil service.
- While supporting the reforms, the article argues the army must improve its training and preparation to justify the influx of conscripts.
Switzerland is set to vote on June 14 on reforms aimed at curbing the growing popularity of civil service, which has been drawing individuals away from mandatory military duty. The civil service, initially conceived as an alternative for conscientious objectors, has become increasingly attractive to young people, offering a less demanding path than military training.
Over the years, the principle of civil service as an exception has eroded. The appeal of civilian roles, often allowing individuals to return home nightly and pursue career-relevant internships, contrasts sharply with the strict schedules and communal living of military barracks. The Federal Council's proposed measures seek to restore a sense of fairness and return to the original intent of the system, making civil service less accessible, especially for those who have completed their initial army recruit training.
The core issue driving these reforms is the "hemorrhage of army personnel." As the security situation in Europe deteriorates, the dwindling number of volunteers for military service is a growing concern for Switzerland's defense capabilities. The nation's defense strategy relies on citizens fulfilling their military obligations and remaining available for mobilization. The proposed reforms are seen as a necessary step to bolster army ranks.
However, the article cautions against a blank check for the military. It highlights numerous anecdotes of soldiers experiencing "dead time" during repetitions, engaging in exercises perceived as pointless, and facing equipment shortages. The authors argue that the army and its leadership must imbue the service with greater meaning and improve its preparedness for threats. A "yes" vote on June 14 is deemed necessary, but the army must demonstrate that it merits the reinforcements it is expected to receive.
Originally published by Le Temps in French. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.