[Column] Yong Hye-in Should Give Up Both the Ministerial Nomination and Her Parliamentary Seat
Translated from Korean and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- The Dong-A Ilbo column criticizes Basic Income Party lawmaker Yong Hye-inโs nomination as minister of gender equality and family.
- It argues that the nomination may serve to divert scrutiny from Justice Minister nominee Kim Seung-won and questions Yongโs suitability to represent younger voters.
- The columnist says the values of fairness conflict with what he describes as Yongโs political record of rule-breaking, parasitism and entitlement.
The nomination of Yong Hye-in as candidate for minister of gender equality and family brings to mind the Chinese strategy of sacrificing something small to save something more important, writes the Dong-A Ilbo columnist.
The strategy, known as โLi Dai Tao Jiang,โ is the 11th tactic in the ancient Chinese military text Thirty-Six Stratagems. When circumstances are unfavorable, it calls for sacrificing the plum tree to protect the peach tree. In Go, the equivalent would be a sacrificial-stone tactic. In broader terms, it resembles using bait.
The columnist says Yongโs โuseโ may be to spread out the political offensive over the vetting of Justice Minister nominee Kim Seung-won. Apart from that possibility, the column says, it is difficult to find a convincing reason for selecting her.
Born in 1990, Yong is 36 this year. At first glance, that could make her appear well suited to represent people in their 20s and 30s. But the columnist argues that younger voters care less about such an outward image than about fairness. In his assessment, Yongโs political career has been marked by โrule-breaking,โ โparasitismโ and a โsense of entitlement,โ putting her at odds with the value she would need to represent.
Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.