Commentary: Trump is Slipping Into an Iran Quagmire

America's approach to Iran is shifting, with negotiation no longer seen as a viable path to achieving U.S. objectives. Gideon Rachman, writing for the Financial Times, suggests that the focus is returning to regime change as a primary strategy. This perspective implies a move away from diplomatic engagement towards more assertive measures.

The commentary posits that diplomatic avenues have been exhausted or proven ineffective in influencing Iran's behavior. Consequently, the option of actively pursuing a change in the Iranian government is being reconsidered. This approach, if adopted, would represent a significant departure from previous policies that prioritized dialogue and sanctions as tools of influence.

Rachman's analysis indicates a growing belief within certain circles that only a fundamental alteration of Iran's leadership can lead to the desired outcomes for the United States. The article frames this as a strategic re-evaluation, moving regime change from the periphery back to the center of policy considerations.