Commentary: Trump's "favoritism diplomacy" carries high costs for the U.S.
Translated from German, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A commentary argues that Donald Trump's "favoritism diplomacy," outsourcing key tasks to family and business partners like Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, undermines U.S. credibility and national interests.
- The article criticizes the lack of diplomatic experience and significant conflicts of interest among Trump's appointees, citing deals involving Witkoff's son's cryptocurrency company in Pakistan.
- It suggests that this personalized, opaque approach to diplomacy resembles a marketplace where access, influence, and profit are intertwined, eroding political norms.
Effective diplomacy relies on credibility, consistency, and a clear focus on national interests. However, the personalized, opaque, and potentially corrupt "favoritism diplomacy" employed by the Trump administration failed to uphold these principles, ultimately harming the United States, according to a commentary in the Neue Zรผrcher Zeitung.
The article criticizes President Donald Trump for delegating crucial diplomatic functions to his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and real estate magnate Steve Witkoff, rather than relying on the State Department and professional diplomats. This move, unusual in most democracies, reportedly faced little significant resistance and was often dismissed as mere "unorthodoxy," despite potentially severe long-term consequences.
Kushner, who previously advised Trump and brokered the Abraham Accords, and Witkoff, a business partner, were appointed as special envoys for peace. The commentary highlights their lack of prior diplomatic experience and significant conflicts of interest. For instance, Witkoff's son heads a cryptocurrency firm, World Liberty Financial, in which the Trump and Witkoff families hold a controlling stake. This firm signed investment and cross-border transaction agreements with Pakistan, a country also involved in U.S.-Iran talks.
The article posits that when individuals negotiate geopolitical outcomes and explore business opportunities simultaneously in the same location, diplomacy begins to resemble a marketplace. In this environment, access, influence, and profit become closely intertwined, leading to a situation where the moderating force of political norms diminishes as public outrage fades.
Originally published by Neue Zรผrcher Zeitung in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.