Commentary: Zurich rejects dangerous housing experiment, needs real solutions

Zurich voters decisively rejected two left-wing housing initiatives on Sunday, with an estimated 55% voting no. This outcome represents a setback for tenant associations, the SP, Greens, and AL, despite their use of dramatic stories about evictions to gain public support.

The canton has now avoided what is described as a "dangerous experiment." Past experiences in cantons like Basel and Geneva, which have implemented similar "housing protection" policies, indicate that such regulations lead to decreased construction and renovation. This, in turn, widens the gap between offered and existing rents, forcing more people to remain in unsuitable housing.

However, the rejection of these initiatives does not mean the housing shortage is resolved. The vacancy rate across most of the canton remains worryingly low, and rents are consistently rising. The vote margin was also less clear than in November's vote on preemptive purchase rights, with significant majorities in Zurich, Winterthur, and Uster supporting the left-wing proposals. This indicates a sense of urgency among urban residents that needs addressing to prevent social tensions.

The article argues against further market restrictions and state intervention, citing the recent votes. Instead, it suggests alternative approaches. One such proposal, an SVP initiative, would prioritize Swiss citizens over foreigners for rental housing. The author dismisses this as discriminatory and an infringement on landlords' freedom to choose tenants.

The proposed solution is to build more housing and increase density. The article states that rising rents are inevitable where demand outstrips supply. It emphasizes that the best way to combat the housing crisis is through increased construction, particularly in areas with growing populations.