Concacaf questions Infantino's leadership, suggests removal possible

Concacaf has issued a sharp rebuke of FIFA President Gianni Infantino, questioning his leadership and suggesting he could be removed from his post. The statement came after Infantino's controversial attempt to partially privatize the marketing of the upcoming World Cup, a move that drew significant opposition from major football confederations.

The UEFA, representing 55 European federations, was the first to voice strong opposition, even threatening to boycott FIFA competitions. This stance was later joined by the Asian Football Confederation (47 members) and Concacaf (55 members), though the US association within Concacaf expressed internal dissent. South American confederation CONMEBOL, however, adopted a more measured approach, expressing openness to studying Infantino's proposal.

“

The future of the FIFA World Cup, football's greatest asset, was pushed forward outside of any established governance framework, without transparency, consultation, or due process.

Concacaf's statement, released on Saturday, congratulated member federations for their "courage and unity" in opposing the project. The confederation criticized the secrecy surrounding the initiative, which was only revealed after a report by The Times. "The future of the FIFA World Cup, football's greatest asset, was pushed forward outside of any established governance framework, without transparency, consultation, or due process," Concacaf stated.

The North and Central American body believes Infantino's actions indicate a "leadership that has ceased to prioritize football" and constitute a "pattern of errors and similar behaviors." Concacaf suggested that Infantino risks becoming isolated, with potential support only from Africa and possibly South America. According to FIFA statutes, his removal would require an extraordinary assembly and a simple majority vote from 43 of the 221 registered member associations.

“

This recent unilateral and flagrant act of mismanagement and leadership falls within a pattern of similar errors and behaviors. An exhaustive analysis of this presidency is imperative.