Conspiracy theories fuel Ebola outbreak in Congo
Translated from Dutch, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Conspiracy theories about Ebola are spreading in eastern Congo, hindering efforts to control the outbreak.
- Residents believe the disease is fake or invented for profit, causing them to avoid medical care.
- Health workers are combating misinformation by collaborating with local communities to encourage treatment and testing.
In eastern Congo, the Ebola outbreak is not only spreading the virus but also a wave of misinformation. Residents are falling prey to conspiracy theories, believing the disease is a fabrication or a tool for political profit. This deep-seated distrust is preventing many from seeking essential medical care, thus fueling the epidemic's spread.
We have social media against us.
Infectious disease specialist Laurens Liesenborghs, on the ground in Bunia, highlights the significant challenge posed by social media. "One in two patients does not survive a treatment center," he explained in the podcast 'The Hour of Truth.' This grim statistic, he notes, fuels the conspiracy theories. The visible fear and the stark appearance of treatment centers, often hastily erected tents, contribute to the public's apprehension.
One in two patients does not survive a treatment center. That gives rise to conspiracy theories.
Liesenborghs emphasizes that controlling an Ebola epidemic is typically manageable, provided people seek testing and treatment. However, the widespread mistrust and the belief that "treatment centers are supposedly where you really get sick" create a critical barrier. Health workers are actively working to counter this disinformation by building trust and collaborating closely with local communities, recognizing that community engagement is key to overcoming the crisis.
False ideas and fake news play a big role in the spread of Ebola.
Originally published by VRT NWS in Dutch. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.