DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria /Crime & Justice

Court Dismisses $19.6 Million Suit Against NNPC

From The Punch · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • A Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja dismissed a $19.6 million lawsuit against the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC).
  • The suit was filed by Alternate Dimensions Ventures Ltd over alleged professional fees from a Direct Sale, Direct Purchase contract.
  • The court ruled that the claimant failed to prove the contract was orally modified beyond its written terms, upholding the principle that written agreements are binding.

The Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja has thrown out a $19.6 million lawsuit brought against the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC). Alternate Dimensions Ventures Ltd had sued the state oil company, claiming professional fees stemming from a Direct Sale, Direct Purchase (DSDP) contract.

The contract between the parties is clear and unambiguous.

โ€” Justice Hamza Muโ€™azuFederal Capital Territory High Court judge, ruling on the NNPC lawsuit.

In a ruling delivered on May 22, 2026, Justice Hamza Muโ€™azu found that the claimant had not established that the contract's scope was expanded beyond the original written agreement. Alternate Dimensions Ventures Ltd had argued that the contract was modified through oral agreements, entitling them to the substantial sum for services rendered under this revised arrangement.

However, the NNPC, represented by Ituah Imhanze of KENNA LP, successfully argued that parties are bound by the explicit terms of their written contracts unless amendments are formally documented. Imhanze contended that the claimant's case was legally unsustainable without any written variation to the contract.

no credible evidence was placed before the court to establish any expansion of the contractual scope as alleged by the claimant.

โ€” Justice Hamza Muโ€™azuFederal Capital Territory High Court judge, explaining the dismissal of the lawsuit.

Justice Muโ€™azu concurred with the defense, reinforcing the legal principle that written contracts cannot be expanded through verbal discussions, assumptions, or conduct not explicitly recorded. The judge stated, "The contract between the parties is clear and unambiguous," adding that no credible evidence was presented to support the alleged expansion of the contractual scope. The court concluded that the NNPC had fulfilled its obligations and committed no breach, dismissing the suit for lacking merit. This decision reinforces the importance of documented agreements in contractual disputes.

without any written amendment or variation to the contract, the claimantโ€™s case is legally unsustainable.

โ€” Ituah ImhanzeCounsel for NNPCL, arguing against the lawsuit.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Punch in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.