DistantNews
Support us

Court to rule on Olawepo-Hashim’s Accord presidential ticket suit

From The Punch · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim is suing the Accord Party, seeking recognition as its presidential candidate for the 2027 general election.
  • The suit challenges the authenticity of documents presented by the party and INEC regarding the cancellation of presidential primaries.
  • The court has reserved judgment after parties presented their final arguments.

A chieftain of the Accord Party, Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim, is pursuing legal action to be recognized as the party's presidential candidate for the 2027 general election. He has filed a suit at the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking an order to compel the party to submit his name to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as its candidate.

The document lacked the party’s official stamp and was addressed to the INEC chairman but was received by an unnamed national commissioner.

— Henry Akunebu (SAN)Challenging the authenticity of documents presented by the Accord Party and INEC.

Olawepo-Hashim's counsel, Henry Akunebu (SAN), urged the court to direct Accord to upload his name to INEC's nomination portal and for the electoral body to accept it. The lawyer contested the validity of documents presented by Accord and INEC, particularly a letter allegedly canceling the party's presidential primaries, arguing they lacked official endorsement and were fabricated.

The presidential primaries had been validly cancelled after no aspirant purchased nomination forms or presented themselves for the exercise.

— T.W. OlusesiArguing for the Accord Party that the presidential primaries were legitimately canceled.

The Accord Party, through its counsel T.W. Olusesi, argued for the dismissal of the suit, maintaining that the presidential primaries were validly canceled because no aspirants purchased nomination forms. INEC's counsel, D.J. Gusen, supported the party's stance, stating the commission was notified of the cancellation. The court has reserved judgment on the matter.

The commission did not monitor the exercise because it received a letter notifying it of the cancellation through one of its national commissioners.

— D.J. GusenRepresenting INEC's position on why the presidential primary was not monitored.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Punch. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.