DistantNews
Support us

Court Upholds FCCPC’s Powers to Regulate Over N400bn Consumer Airtime Lending Market

From ThisDay · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • A Nigerian court upheld the powers of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) to regulate the digital consumer lending market, including airtime credit services.
  • The ruling dismissed a lawsuit by the Wireless Application Service Providers Association of Nigeria (WASPAN), validating the FCCPC's DEON regulations.
  • The judgment allows the FCCPC to resume enforcement in the estimated N400 billion airtime credit industry, clarifying regulatory mandates with the Nigerian Communications Commission.

A Federal High Court in Lagos has affirmed the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission's (FCCPC) authority to regulate Nigeria's digital consumer lending market, a sector estimated at N400 billion. This landmark ruling validates the FCCPC's Digital, Electronic, Online and Non-Traditional Consumer Lending (DEON) Regulations, dismissing a suit filed by the Wireless Application Service Providers Association of Nigeria (WASPAN).

The judgment by Justice Ambrose Lewis-Allagoa removes a significant legal hurdle that had temporarily halted the FCCPC's enforcement actions against operators in the digital lending ecosystem, including providers of Airtime Credit Services (ACS). The court found that the FCCPC acted within its statutory and constitutional powers when issuing the DEON Regulations, deeming them valid measures to protect consumers and prevent anti-competitive practices.

The court clarified the regulatory landscape, stating that the FCCPC's jurisdiction stems from the Nigerian Constitution and the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act (FCCPA). It held that the FCCPC's powers in competition and consumer protection matters take precedence, while sector regulators like the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) retain their technical and licensing responsibilities. The relationship between these bodies is complementary, not conflicting, with "concurrency meaning coexistence, not displacement."

WASPAN had argued that the DEON Regulations conflicted with the Nigerian Communications Act. However, the court ruled that both statutes could be harmoniously interpreted, with the FCCPA providing the applicable legal framework for competition and consumer protection issues. This decision is expected to reshape oversight and enhance consumer protection within Nigeria's rapidly growing digital lending market.

Concurrency means coexistence, not displacement.

— Justice Ambrose Lewis-AllagoaExplaining the complementary regulatory mandates between FCCPC and sector regulators.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by ThisDay. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.