Croatia Didn't Lose Because AI Made a Mistake, But Because Humans Decided How to Use It
Translated from Croatian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Croatia's World Cup elimination was due to human decisions on using AI, not AI errors.
- Technology provided precise data, but humans chose how to interpret and apply it, prioritizing microscopic details over the game's spirit.
- The increasing reliance on technology in football shifts responsibility and can create a "digital illusion of objectivity" as algorithms lack morality or conscience.
Croatia's exit from the World Cup was not a failure of artificial intelligence but a consequence of human choices in how to utilize the technology, according to an analysis in Veฤernji List. While AI and VAR were introduced to correct clear errors and promote fairness, their application has evolved to focus on microscopic details, sometimes at the expense of the game's integrity.
The technology accurately measured data imperceptible to the human eye, but it was human judgment that decided the significance of these details. The article argues that prioritizing millimeters and milliseconds over the dynamics and fairness of the game fundamentally alters football's philosophy. This shift, where technology provides information but humans grant it authority and interpretation, is where the problem lies.
The piece criticizes the trend of offloading responsibility to technology, creating a "digital illusion of objectivity." Algorithms, lacking morality or conscience, simply execute rules. The author points out that when technology is used inconsistently across different matches, the system faces further issues. Football has always had its share of errors and controversies, but the current reliance on technology allows individuals to hide behind algorithms, a stark contrast to past human errors like Maradona's "Hand of God."
Originally published by Veฤernji List in Croatian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.