Cut the cameras: Flock surveillance systems trigger rare bipartisan backlash
Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Politicians from both major US political camps are opposing surveillance cameras made by Flock Safety.
- The backlash reflects growing public resistance to the spread of technology viewed as intrusive, including large data centers that support artificial intelligence.
- Polling cited in the article shows about 75% of Americans oppose building new data centers in their communities.
Flock Safety’s surveillance cameras are drawing an unusual response in the United States: politicians on the right and left are joining forces against them. In a country sharply divided by politics, opposition to a single technology company is becoming increasingly visible.
The backlash comes as more Americans question the expansion of surveillance technology. Flock cameras have become a focus for politicians from both sides, who are pushing back as public resistance grows.
The pattern resembles the nationwide anger over plans to build the large data centers that power artificial intelligence. Polling cited in the article found that roughly 75% of Americans oppose new data center construction in their communities.
The opposition puts Flock in the middle of a broader debate over the political limits of a strongly pro-technology agenda. As resistance spreads, surveillance cameras and the infrastructure behind artificial intelligence are becoming shared targets across the political spectrum.
Originally published by The Guardian in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.