DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Elections & Politics

Dalseong-gun council members defend Lee Jin-suk amid calls for expulsion: 'Don't trample on the citizens' choice'

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Under investigation
  • Local council members in Dalseong-gun, South Korea, defended ruling party lawmaker Lee Jin-suk against calls for her expulsion over remarks allegedly distorting the 1980 Gwangju Uprising.
  • The local council members argued that while the historical significance of the Gwangju Uprising must be respected, academic research and discussion should not be suppressed.
  • Lee Jin-suk, a member of the People Power Party, faces criticism and demands for disciplinary action following a forum she hosted that sparked controversy over historical interpretations.

Local council members in Dalseong-gun, South Korea, have publicly defended Lee Jin-suk, a lawmaker from the ruling People Power Party, against mounting calls for her expulsion. The controversy stems from Lee's alleged distortion andํ„ํ›ผ (belittling) of the 1980 Gwangju Uprising during a parliamentary forum she hosted.

We offer our deepest condolences to those who sacrificed during the 5.18 democratization movement and to their families who have suffered.

โ€” Dalseong-gun Council Members of the People Power PartyAcknowledging the historical significance and human cost of the Gwangju Uprising.

In a statement released under the name 'Dalseong-gun Council Members of the People Power Party,' the local officials urged against disregarding the choice of the Dalseong-gun constituents who elected Lee. They acknowledged the sacrifices of those involved in the Gwangju Uprising and offered condolences to the victims and their families. However, they argued that respecting history and engaging in academic research, questioning, and discussion are not mutually exclusive.

However, respecting history and engaging in research, questioning, and discussion about that history are not contradictory.

โ€” Dalseong-gun Council Members of the People Power PartyArguing for the right to academic inquiry alongside historical respect.

The statement questioned whether hosting an academic discussion forum should be grounds for expelling a lawmaker. It also raised concerns about whether holding the elected representative accountable for individual speakers' remarks undermines democracy. The council members asserted that forums are meant for presenting and verifying different arguments, not just confirming existing beliefs, and that the Gwangju Uprising is a history belonging to all South Koreans, thus deserving of open discussion.

Is holding an academic discussion forum grounds for expelling a member of the National Assembly? Is it truly democracy to suspend the duties of a representative elected by the people by holding the host lawmaker responsible for the individual remarks of the presenters?

โ€” Dalseong-gun Council Members of the People Power PartyQuestioning the basis for Lee Jin-suk's potential expulsion.

Lee Jin-suk has been under fire since hosting the 'Re-examination Forum on the 5.18 Democratic Uprising' on August 13. The main opposition Democratic Party submitted a motion for her expulsion the following day. Various Gwangju Uprising survivor and civic groups in Daegu have also demanded disciplinary action and expulsion from the People Power Party, intensifying the pressure on the ruling party.

A discussion is not a place to confirm the same thoughts, but a place to present and verify different arguments and grounds.

โ€” Dalseong-gun Council Members of the People Power PartyDefining the purpose of academic forums.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.