Danish Government Parties Call for Openness in Afghanistan Inquiry
Translated from Danish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Representatives of Denmark's four governing parties now support allowing the Afghanistan inquiry to identify ministers and politicians in quotations.
- The inquiry, prepared by researchers at the Danish Institute for International Studies, was commissioned after Denmark and other countries left Afghanistan in 2021.
- The government hopes the report can be published by the end of 2026, after earlier support for possible anonymization created uncertainty.
Denmark's governing parties have changed course and are asking for openness in a disputed inquiry into the country's military involvement in Afghanistan.
supports openness on these questions
In a submission to the Folketing Presidium, the four government parties' representatives on the Foreign Policy Committee recommended that the committee's records be used and that ministers and members of parliament could be quoted without first submitting the quotations to them or their relatives for approval.
The inquiry was prepared by researchers at the Danish Institute for International Studies after a broad parliamentary majority commissioned it in 2021. In May 2026, however, the Folketing Presidium decided that politicians could have their names removed from quotations, breaking with earlier practice. That decision followed a recommendation from the Foreign Policy Committee, whose government-party representatives had previously supported the possibility of anonymity.
at least been a strong inspiration
Committee chairman Karsten Hรธnge said the parties had now reconsidered the issue. He told Ritzau that a citizens' initiative started by a veteran, which gathered more than 50,000 signatures against possible anonymization, had โat least been a strong inspirationโ for the government's new position. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen had also said in August that the government โsupports openness on these questions.โ
uncertainty and doubt
The government parties are urging other parties to join them. Because several parties had already opposed anonymization, a majority may be possible, although the four governing parties hold seven of the committee's 17 seats. Hรธnge said the earlier decision should be reversed now rather than waiting for the citizens' initiative to be processed, because that process had created โuncertainty and doubt.โ The inquiry concerns two decades of confidential political discussions about the Afghanistan mission, in which 44 Danish soldiers died. The government hopes to publish it before the end of 2026.
We might as well get on with it now instead of waiting for it to be dealt with. Why not simply change it here and now?
Originally published by Berlingske in Danish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.