DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Crime & Justice

Defense in Netanyahu trial opposes expansion of trial hearing days, Netanyahu in courtroom

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's defense team will oppose expanding his criminal trial to five hearing days per week.
  • Attorneys argue the increased schedule is unrealistic and would hinder proper witness preparation, potentially slowing the trial.
  • The defense also seeks to have the bribery charge in Case 4000 dismissed, arguing it is the most weighty and complex accusation.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's defense team plans to contest a court decision to expand his criminal trial to five hearing days each week. The Jerusalem District Court had ruled that proceedings would resume five days a week starting October 4, after the High Holy Days.

If the court wants to shorten this trial, the solution cannot be to stifle us - this is a shortcut that is actually long.

โ€” Amit HadadNetanyahu's attorney arguing against the expanded trial schedule.

Netanyahu's lead attorney, Amit Hadad, argued that the expanded schedule is unrealistic and would force his team to work around the clock. He stated that this would actually slow down the trial, as insufficient time would be available for proper witness preparation. Hadad compared the situation to the Eichmann trial, noting it was the only other trial held five days a week.

Attorneys for other defendants echoed these concerns. Jacques Chen, representing Shaul and Iris Elovich in Case 4000, called the five-day schedule "inhumane" and "unrealistic," arguing it violates due process rights and would place an immense burden on defendants and witnesses. Chen suggested this approach would not effectively speed up the trial.

Five days is inhumane, unrealistic and mismatched to any human capabilities within these time constraints.

โ€” Jacques ChenAttorney for defendants in Case 4000 expressing concerns about the trial expansion.

Furthermore, Hadad specifically targeted the bribery charge in Case 4000, the most serious accusation against Netanyahu. He urged the judges to dismiss this charge, stating that its complexity would necessitate presenting hundreds of witnesses. Both Hadad and Chen projected that they could not provide adequate defense for their clients under the proposed intensive schedule.

the bribery charge needs to be thrown out the window... Even you [the judges] don't know what to do with it... If the bribery charge stays, we are talking about [presenting] hundreds of witnesses.

โ€” Amit HadadNetanyahu's attorney arguing for the dismissal of the bribery charge in Case 4000.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.