Defense seeks acquittal or reduced sentence for ex-treasurer in National Bank embezzlement case

San José, Costa Rica – The defense team for a former treasurer accused of a multimillion-dollar embezzlement at the National Bank is arguing for his acquittal or, alternatively, a significantly reduced sentence. The lawyers contend that the prosecution has not provided sufficient evidence to prove their client misappropriated funds as alleged.

During the trial, the defense highlighted what they perceive as a lack of concrete proof regarding the specific method of alleged embezzlement. The prosecution's case reportedly centers on the claim that the former treasurer removed money in manila envelopes. However, the defense team asserts that this has not been demonstrably proven in court.

“

They argue that during the debate, it could not be proven that the official took money out of manila envelopes, as accused by the Public Ministry.

Attorneys Luis Alberto Venegas Marín and Eduardo Jiménez are representing the accused. They are advocating for an acquittal based on reasonable doubt, suggesting the evidence presented does not conclusively link their client to the alleged financial crimes. The legal team is focused on dismantling the prosecution's narrative by questioning the validity and sufficiency of the evidence presented against their client.

The case involves a significant sum, and the outcome could have implications for the accused's career and the bank's internal controls. The defense's strategy appears to hinge on creating doubt about the prosecution's ability to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, particularly concerning the alleged method of fund removal.

“

They asked for acquittal due to doubt of their client.