Democratic Party moves to abolish prosecution's supplementary investigation rights

The Democratic Party has officially declared its intention to completely abolish the prosecution's supplementary investigation rights, a move seen as an effort to preemptively neutralize the issue from becoming a contentious point in the upcoming August 17 party convention. This decision aims to prevent internal competition over the matter and maintain party unity.

“

Detailed differences in understanding should not shake the principle of separating investigation and prosecution, nor should they be a means to reinstate the prosecution's investigative authority.

Party leader Han Byung-do stated that any perceived differences in understanding should not undermine the principle of separating investigation and prosecution or serve as a means to reinstate the prosecution's investigative powers. He outlined proposed measures to solidify the supplementary investigation rights, including demanding the replacement and disciplinary action for investigators involved in inadequate probes. The party also suggested implementing a cross-investigation system between the police and the special prosecutor's office for serious crimes, enhancing external audits of police investigations, and introducing rights for victims to object and access case records.

The party's swift action follows internal discussions where a 'cautious approach' gained traction, influenced by the presidential office's statement urging a swift conclusion to avoid unnecessary confusion. The Jo Guk Innovation Party also pressured the Democratic Party by calling for legislative action within July. With the upcoming establishment of the Public Prosecutor's Office and the Special Prosecutor's Office for Serious Crimes in October, there is a sense of urgency to finalize these legislative changes.

“

It is right to eliminate the issue before the party convention. It is not desirable for this to divide opinions during the vote. Given that the Public Prosecutor's Office is launching soon, we must sort this out first.

Despite the party's push, public opinion presents a significant hurdle. Recent polls indicate a strong opposition to the complete abolition of supplementary investigation rights, with one survey showing 55.3% against the move, compared to 27.4% in favor. Another poll revealed 61% favored maintaining the rights, while only 23% supported complete abolition. Legal experts have expressed disappointment, calling the decision unfortunate for the majority of citizens who wish to retain these rights.

“

This is a very unfortunate decision from the perspective of the majority of the public who believe supplementary investigation rights need to be maintained.