"Dissident Allures": Subversion as Second Skin from the 19th Century to Today

A new collective publication, "Allures dissidentes. Apparences queer et représentations de soi du 19e siècle à aujourd’hui" (Dissident Allures: Queer Appearances and Self-Representations from the 19th Century to Today), delves into the cultural and material history of queer aesthetics. The book examines how clothing and accessories have been subverted to express queer identities across different eras, from the 19th century to the present day.

“

Every day, by dressing, styling our hair, and choosing our shoes, we produce, without necessarily being aware of it, "allures."

Edited academically by art historians Elizabeth Fischer and Magali Le Mens, the work uniquely focuses on the Francophone world. It gathers contributions related to Belgium, French-speaking Canada, metropolitan France, Guadeloupe, and Switzerland. This focus is presented as a significant and necessary innovation, filling a void in existing French-language research on the subject.

The theoretical approach adopted aligns with cultural studies, aiming for inclusivity and moving beyond dominant binary and heteronormative perspectives. The editors express a caution against rigid theoretical frameworks, advocating instead for a constant questioning of theory to remain attuned to nuances and individual singularities. The publication emphasizes that nothing is neutral or fixed; even the most ordinary items can become powerful tools of dissent and subversion.

“

You spot a shimmering light in the distance and upon approaching, you land on page 177.

"Allures dissidentes" showcases examples like the T-shirt and the backpack. Originally considered undergarments or specialized gear, these items evolved into mainstream fashion statements, often serving as canvases for slogans and personal expression. The book illustrates how, depending on the wearer, the context, and the historical period, the meaning and subversive potential of any garment or accessory can be profoundly transformed.

“

Nothing is neutral, nothing is fixed. A quantity of examples in the book show how much, depending on who wears it, in what context and at what time, the most banal piece of clothing or accessory can become a vector of dissent, of subversion.