DN Debate: "Social services' way forward: Knowledge out and repression in"

Six researchers in social work are sounding an alarm over the Swedish government's proposed reforms for social child welfare, arguing that the direction taken prioritizes repression over evidence-based knowledge. They assert that measures such as ankle monitors, forced treatments, and fines will ultimately prove ineffective for children and adolescents struggling with behavioral issues.

The researchers express concern that the government is demonstrating a "striking lack of knowledge" in its legislative approach. They point to a pattern over the current term where expert opinions and scientific findings are increasingly sidelined in favor of ideological convictions. This trend is particularly evident in the proposed changes to social child welfare, a critical area of social policy managed by municipal social services.

While acknowledging that coercive measures have a role in protecting children in severe situations, the researchers emphasize that these should be exceptions, not the norm. The core mission of social services includes providing support to vulnerable children and families. The proposed shift, they argue, risks transforming social child welfare from a supportive institution into a controlling and essentially punitive one.

Historically, the balance between voluntary support and compulsory intervention within social child welfare has fluctuated. However, the current political ambition appears to be a significant move towards increased control and a more punitive approach, especially for non-conformist youth and their families. The researchers criticize this direction, suggesting it stems from a political desire to appear decisive rather than from a sound understanding of what truly benefits at-risk young people. They advocate for legislation grounded in solid knowledge and proven experience, contrasting it with the current administration's perceived disregard for such foundations.